Need A Child Injury Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Was There an Injury?

Please Describe the Injury
Click to Ask a Question

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)

Child Injury - Jury Verdicts

______ VERDICT Alleged defective door hinge on Ford Explorer - Failure to warn - Lack of childhood testing or inspection - Partial finger amputation to minor plaintiff.
The plaintiff parents filed this action on behalf of their minor daughter against the defendant Ford Motor Company on both negligence and strict liability theories. The plaintiffs alleged that the door hinges of the defendant's Ford Explorer were dangerously defective causing a partial amputation of their young daughter's finger. The plaintiff also claimed that the defendant fa...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (28637) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ VERDICT Intentional infliction of emotional distress by private investigation service.
In this case, the plaintiff sought damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress allegedly inflicted by a private investigation service and two of its detectives for alleged harassment of the plaintiff. According to the plaintiff, the detectives had been following him and intimidating him and his girlfriend. In addition, one of the detectives had filed a criminal ...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (6985) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ VERDICT Intentional infliction of emotional distress by private investigation service.
In this case, the plaintiff sought damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress from a private investigation service and two of its detectives for alleged harassment of the plaintiff. According to the plaintiff, the detectives had been following him and intimidating him and his girlfriend. In addition, one of the detectives had filed a criminal complaint in Lowell, ...
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (13677) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ VERDICT Intentional infliction of emotional distress by private investigation service.
In this case, the plaintiff sought damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress from a private investigation service and two of its detectives for alleged harassment of the plaintiff. According to the plaintiff, the detectives had been following him and had intimidated both him and his girlfriend. In addition, one of the detectives had filed a criminal complaint in ...
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (13470) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ RECOVERY - 15-YEAR-OLD DECEDENT RUNNING AFTER PRIVATE HIGH SCHOOL BUS IS CAUGHT IN WHEEL WELL AND DRAGGED 3/4 OF A BLOCK - OVER TWO HOURS OF SEVERE PAIN AND SUFFERING - DECEDENT ATTENDING PRIVATE SCHOOL ON SCHOLARSHIP.
This case involved a 15-year-old decedent, a student at St.

John's Prep, who was killed when she ran to catch the first of three private buses that transported her each morning from her home in Jamaica Queens to the campus in Long Island City. The plaintiff contended that the decedent was struck by the turning bus and dragged approximately 3/4 of a block while caught in the ...
- from The New York Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (33909) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ RECOVERY - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - DEFECTIVE AUTOMOBILE - LACK OF ADEQUATE OCCUPANT PROTECTION - DEFECTIVE CHILD SAFETY SEAT - BRAIN INJURY TO 17-MONTH-OLD MINOR - HEAD INJURY WITH BALANCE DIFFICULTIES TO PLAINTIFF MOTHER.
This products liability action was brought against the defendant automobile manufacturer and the manufacturer of a children's car seat.

The plaintiff claimed that the vehicle was dangerously defective in that it lacked adequate interior occupant protection and did not include a complete tether anchorage position for attachment of the child safety seat. The plaintiff also alle...
- from The Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (27002) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ RECOVERY - PRODUCTS LIABILITY - DEFECTIVE AUTOMOBILE - LACK OF ADEQUATE OCCUPANT PROTECTION - DEFECTIVE CHILD SAFETY SEAT - BRAIN INJURY TO 17-MONTH-OLD MINOR - HEAD INJURY WITH BALANCE DIFFICULTIES TO PLAINTIFF MOTHER.
This products liability action was brought against the defendant automobile manufacturer and the manufacturer of a children's car seat. The plaintiff claimed that the vehicle was dangerously defective in that it lacked adequate interior occupant protection and did not include a complete tether anchorage position for attachment of the child safety seat. The plaintiff also alleged ...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (29039) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ RECOVERY AFTER FOUR DAYS OF TRIAL - CLOSED HEAD INJURY - SKULL FRACTURE - PERMANENT BRAIN INJURY TO NINE-YEAR-OLD BOY - REDUCTION IN IQ - DIMINUTION IN FUTURE EARNING CAPACITY SOUGHT.
This action arose from an accident involving the nine-year-old male plaintiff and the defendant's ten-wheel tractor-trailer. The plaintiff claimed the truck made a negligent right-hand turn and ran over the boy. The defendant argued that the minor plaintiff actually walked into the side of its truck. The defense also disputed the extent and nature of the injuries sustained by the plai...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (43551) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ GROSS VERDICT - TORT CLAIMS CASE - PALPABLY UNREASONABLE FAILURE OF CITY TO REPAIR LONG-STANDING POTHOLE - PLAINTIFF PEDESTRIAN TRIPS AND FALLS IN POTHOLE WHILE CROSSING ROADWAY - FRACTURED WRIST.
The plaintiff, in her early 30's, contended that the as she was crossing the roadway, a woman in a van waived her across and that while she was still looking at the van, she failed to observe several potholes in the area. The plaintiff presented this driver who testified that she drove by the area regularly and that the potholes had been present for approximately three years. The...
- from The New Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (17002) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ VERDICT - SCHOOL DISTRICT LIABILITY - NEGLIGENT RETENTION AND SUPERVISION OF CO-DEFENDANT SCHOOL BUS DRIVER BY DEFENDANT BUS COMPANY - REPEATED SEXUAL MOLESTATION OF FEMALE SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENT WITH DOWNS SYNDROME - PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EMOTIONAL DAMAGE.
This was an action brought by the plaintiff as conservator for the female special education student suffering Down's Syndrome who was age six during the relevant time period, for injuries received by the student at the hands of the co-defendant school bus driver who repeatedly sexually molested the plaintiff through fondling. The co-defendant school bus driver was an employee of ...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (29483) Login for Child Injury Verdict

Content provided by JVRA.com. LegalView is not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided above.


Pages: Previous   ...   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   Next

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Child Injury Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Child Injury case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * Personal Injury: Child Injury Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.

This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.