Need A Child Injury Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Was There an Injury?

Please Describe the Injury
Click to Ask a Question

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)

Child Injury - Jury Verdicts

______ $50,000 - Cat Scratch Claim Settles Prior to Trial
Facts: Defendant's cat scratched plaintiff toddler in the eye and caused permanent vision damage. Defendant disputed the allegations, but settled with plaintiffs for $50,000 prior to trial.

Plaintiff Trenton Safford was 18 months old. He walking along a neighborhood street with his father on the day of this incident. Plaintiff Susan N. Safford, the boy's mother, claimed that as ...
- from The Carolina Verdict Reporter (64046) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $10,000 - Dog Owner Disputes Extent of Injury to Child
Facts: A 6 year old child was awarded $10,000 for injuries she suffered following a dog bite. A Lucas County jury deliberated 3 hours before returning its verdict.

Plaintiff Sarai McCreary was a 6 year old female. She walked in through an open gate into her neighbor's back yard and was bitten in the leg by an untethered dog. The dog was owned by Defendant Cheryl Wilson. This law...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (65000) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $438,000 - Shopping Mall Owner Agrees to Pay for Toddler's Head Injury
Facts: A 3 year old was seriously injured when she fell from a wall in a seating area to the floor below in defendant's shopping mall. Defendant denied that it owed a duty to the child, but settled the claim for $438,000 prior to trial.

Plaintiff Christa Hart and her 3 year old daughter, Plaintiff Rodgers, were shopping at Lynhaven Mall, owned by Defendant General Growth Propert...
- from The Virginia Verdict Reporter (138547) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ VERDICT INCLUDING $9,000,000 IN PUNITIVE DAMAGES - HOSPITAL NEGLIGENCE - NURSING NEGLIGENCE - NURSE STRIKES INFANT'S HEAD ON NIGHTSTAND WHILE IN HER CARE - FAILURE TO REPORT INCIDENT TO SUPERIOR OR OBTAIN MEDICAL CARE FOR INFANT - MULTIPLE SKULL FRACTURES - INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE - DEFENDANT HOSPITAL ACCUSED PLAINTIFF'S PARENTS OF CHILD ABUSE - LEFT-SIDED EPIDURAL HEMATOMA WITH BILATERAL PARIETAL BONE FRACTURES.
In this medical negligence matter, the plaintiffs contended that the defendant's nurse was negligent in handling the plaintiff infant and dropped him while he was in her care, causing him to suffer multiple skull fractures. In addition, the defendant reported the injuries sustained by the child to social services as potential child abuse by the plaintiff parents. The defendant initially denied th...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (50803) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ GROSS VERDICT - 11-YEAR-OLD <$IAmputation of thumb>AMPUTATES NON-DOMINANT LEFT THUMB AT DISTAL PHALANX WHILE USING JOINER PLANER POWER TOOL AT FRIEND'S HOUSE - ACTION AGAINST 11-YEAR-OLD FRIEND'S PARENTS ALLEGING <$INegligent supervision>NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION OF CHILDREN'S PLAY.
In this action brought by the parents on behalf of their 11-year- old son, it was alleged that the defendant parents of the son's friend were negligent in failing to adequately supervise the boys while they were playing in the defendants basement. The plaintiff also contended that the defendant parents were negligent in failing to warn the boys not to play with the power equipment...
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (14976) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ VERDICT - WRONGFUL DEATH/PERSONAL INJURY- PRODUCTS LIABILITY - MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION - ALLEGED DEFECTIVE FRONT AND REAR RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - ALLEGED FAILURE TO WARN.
This combined death and personal injury action arose out of a head-on collision between a Ford EXP and the 1987 Hyundai Excel in which the plaintiffs were traveling. The 28-year-old decedent mother, the Excel front-seat passenger, was killed and the three- year-old female rear-seat passenger suffered a paraplegic injury.

It was alleged that the injuries suffered by the deceden...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (29731) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ VERDICT - FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY SCREENSALVATION ARMY YOUTH LEADER - KNOWN SEXUAL OFFENDER PLACED IN SUPERVISORY POSITION - SEXUAL MOLESTATION OF FOUR MINOR BOYS - PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURIES - EMOTIONAL DISTRESS TO PARENTS.
This action was filed by the plaintiff parents on behalf of their four minor sons against the defendant, the Salvation Army. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant negligently allowed a known sexual offender to come into contact with their sons, resulting in sexual molestation for a period of four to 18 months. The plaintiff parents claimed to have sustained emotional distress,...
- from The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (40133) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ VERDICT - PRODUCT LIABILITY - ALLEGED DEFECTIVE DOOR HINGE IN FORD EXPLORER - FAILURE TO WARN - LACK OF CHILDPROOF TESTING OR INSPECTION - PARTIAL FINGER AMPUTATION TO MINOR PLAINTIFF.
The plaintiff parents filed this action on behalf of their minor daughter against the defendant Ford Motor Company on both negligence and strict liability theories. The plaintiffs alleged that the door hinges of the defendant's Ford Explorer were dangerously defective causing a partial amputation of their young daughter's finger. The plaintiff also claimed that the defendant p...
- from The Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (28008) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ VERDICT Alleged defective door hinges on Ford Explorer - Failure to warn - Lack of childproof testing or inspection - Partial finger amputation to minor plaintiff.
The plaintiff parents filed this action on behalf of their minor daughter against the defendant Ford Motor Company on both negligence and strict liability theories. The plaintiffs alleged that the door hinges of the defendant's Ford Explorer were dangerously defective causing a partial amputation of their young daughter's finger. The plaintiff also claimed that the defendant fa...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (6356) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ VERDICT Alleged defective door hinge on Ford Explorer - Failure to warn - Lack of childhood testing or inspection - Partial finger amputation to minor plaintiff.
The plaintiff parents filed this action on behalf of their minor daughter against the defendant Ford Motor Company on both negligence and strict liability theories. The plaintiffs alleged that the door hinges of the defendant's Ford Explorer were dangerously defective causing a partial amputation of their young daughter's finger. The plaintiff also claimed that the defendant fa...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (6763) Login for Child Injury Verdict
Looking for a Child Injury lawyer in Washington, DC? Get in touch with one of our Child Injury lawyers in Washington, DC now.

Content provided by JVRA.com. LegalView is not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided above.


Pages: Previous   ...   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   Next

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Child Injury Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Child Injury case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * Personal Injury: Child Injury Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.

This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.