Need A Child Injury Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Was There an Injury?

Please Describe the Injury
Click to Ask a Question

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)

Child Injury - Jury Verdicts

______ $430,000 - Toddler's Death from Child Abuse Prompts Lawsuit Against Hospital
Facts: The estate of a toddler who died after being released from the hospital with a skull fracture claimed the hospital's failure to report suspected child abuse contributed to the young girl's death. The case settled for $430,000 prior to trial.

Plaintiff's decedent, a 20 month old female, was visiting Myrtle Beach with her mother and her mother's boyfriend. She was taken to ...
- from The Carolina Verdict Reporter (127630) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $183,000 with a $180,000 contribution from Defendant Ward Trucking, $2,000 from Defendant EFS, and $1,000 from DeKalb County. Breakdown: $45,000 to Plaintiff Minor Daniel Jones, III, and $138,000 for Plaintiffs Jenny and Daniel Jones, Jr., joint and several. - Police Stop Triggers Interstate Chain Collision
Facts: A chain reaction accident on I-285 resulted in serious injuries to the occupants of plaintiffs' vehicle. They sought damages from all parties involved, who disputed responsibility for plaintiffs' injuries. The case was settled for $183,000 on the first day of trial with contribution from all defendants, primarily Defendant Ward Trucking.

Plaintiff Daniel Jones, Jr. was dr...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (131380) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $375,000 with both defendants contributing. $150,000 of the settlement was placed into a structured settlement and $14,000 was being held in trust for a Medicaid lien. - Toy Manufacturer Settles Child's Eye Injury Claim
Facts: Following mediation, a $375,000 settlement was reached between a manufacturer and a child who sustained a permanent eye injury while playing with defendant manufacturer's toy. A distributor of the toy also contributed to the settlement.

Plaintiff AuDante Wilson, age 7, was playing with his 9 year old brother on Christmas Day. They had received a toy ninja set that include...
- from The Carolina Verdict Reporter (126817) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ Defense verdict - School Bus Driver Not Negligent for Striking Student
Facts: A school bus driver who drove over an elementary school child was found not negligent by a Genesee County jury. As a result, a verdict of no cause of action was entered on the child's injury claims.

Plaintiff, a 10 year old girl, was struck by a school bus at an elementary school. The school reportedly had a poorly designed traffic pattern. The school was looped by a one ...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (134041) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ Defense verdict - Mervyn's Found Not Liable for Child's Injury Claim
Facts: Inconsistent statements by a young boy about what part of his body was injured when a fitting room door allegedly fell and struck him may have impacted this no cause verdict in Oakland County. The jury returned the verdict after an hour of deliberation.

Plaintiff Troy Page, age 11, was shopping at Defendant Mervyn's store. According to plaintiff, a door fell and struck hi...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (134014) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $2,250,000 plus prejudgment interest for a total verdict of $2,720,000. The verdict was subsequently reduced to the statutory cap of $1,550,000. Breakdown: $1,250,000 for plaintiff infant and $1,000,000 for plaintiff mother. - Jury Awards Large Sum for Child's Brachial Plexus Injury
Facts: An infant suffered a shoulder injury during birth and was awarded $2,250,000 by a Norfolk City jury after finding that the defendant OB/GYN used an improper technique during the delivery. The award was reduced to the statutory cap of $1,550,000.

Plaintiff Joanne Johnson gave birth to Plaintiff Mary Johnson. A physician employed by Defendant Gynecology Associates attended ...
- from The Virginia Verdict Reporter (63208) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $2,250,000 plus prejudgment interest for a total verdict of $2,720,000. The verdict was subsequently reduced to the statutory cap of $1,550,000. Breakdown: $1,250,000 for plaintiff infant and $1,000,000 for plaintiff mother. - Jury Awards Large Sum for Child's Brachial Plexus Injury
Facts: An infant suffered a shoulder injury during birth and was awarded $2,250,000 by a Norfolk City jury after finding that the defendant OB/GYN used an improper technique during the delivery. The award was reduced to the statutory cap of $1,550,000.

Plaintiff Joanne Johnson gave birth to Plaintiff Mary Johnson. A physician employed by Defendant Gynecology Associates attended ...
- from The Virginia Verdict Reporter (138267) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $4,800,000 - Settlement Reached for Alleged Birth Injuries
Facts: A $4,800,000 settlement for severe birth injuries was reached after evidence of discrepancies in nursing notes and diagnostic testing were discovered. Defendants claimed the child's injury occurred before labor and delivery.

Plaintiff infant was delivered at defendant hospital by its nurses. The chart recorded Apgar scores of 6, 8 and 8 at one minute, 5 minutes and 10 min...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (133945) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $1,481,376. Breakdown: $47,468 in future medical expenses; $633,908 in lost earning capacity; and $800,000 in non - Child Awarded Damages for Injuries Received During Birth
Facts: An infant suffered a shoulder injury during birth and was ultimately awarded $1,481,376 by a Baltimore City jury after finding that the defendant OB/GYN used excessive force during the delivery. The jury had been deadlocked for four days before reaching the verdict.

On June 29, 2002, plaintiff Tarajee King gave birth to a daughter, Plaintiff Basheerah Ruffin. Defendant Ka...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (129764) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $22,000. Breakdown: $6,323 to Virginia for outstanding liens and medicals; $350 for lost wages; $1,000 for the use and benefit of K. J.; $6,121 to clerk of court to be invested in an interest - Queso Dip Burn Sparks Lawsuit Against Applebee's
Facts: An 8 month old child was burned on hot queso dip after a waitress placed it near the child. Defendant argued that plaintiff mother failed to properly supervise the child. The case settled for $22,000 prior to trial.

Plaintiff K. J. and her mother, Plaintiff Ashly Jones, were at a Defendant Applebee's of Virginia restaurant. When an order of queso cheese dip was brought to...
- from The Virginia Verdict Reporter (138539) Login for Child Injury Verdict

Pages: Previous   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   ...   Next

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Child Injury Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Child Injury case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * Personal Injury: Child Injury Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.

This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.