Need A Child Injury Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Was There an Injury?

Please Describe the Injury
Click to Ask a Question

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)

Child Injury - Jury Verdicts

______ Defense verdict - Plaintiff's Concern for Property Damage Before Child's Safety in Auto Accident Influences Jury
Facts: A DeKalb County jury found against a plaintiff who reportedly showed more concern for potential damage to his car in a rear-end collision than possible injury to his own child. The jury returned a defense verdict after about 2.5 hours of deliberation.

Plaintiff Luc DelPorte, a 35 year old male, was operating a vehicle with his child as a passenger. Plaintiff stopped at an...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (130502) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $60,000 - Settlement Reached in Auto Case in Lieu of Third Trial Following Two Mistrials
Facts: A grandmother injured in a head-on collision with a dump truck agreed to settle her injury claim for $60,000 in order to avoid a third trial following two mistrials.

Plaintiff Marsha Kolich was approaching a tunnel on a one-way road when she confronted a dump truck exiting the tunnel in the wrong direction directly ahead of her. The vehicles collided head-on. The dump tru...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (128286) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $9,450,000 with $100,000 contribution from Defendant Stewart and $9,350,000 from Defendant VCA. - Child Paralyzed in Auto Accident Settles with Her Father's Employer
Facts: A 14 month old child was permanently paralyzed as a result injuries she suffered in an automobile accident. She pursued claims against the owner of a vehicle which stalled in the middle of the roadway and against her father's employer. Ultimately, the father's employer agreed to settle this case for $9,350,000. An additional $100,000 was received from the owner of the stalled vehicle...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (130751) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ RECOVERY AFTER FOUR DAYS OF TRIAL - TRUCK/PEDESTRIAN COLLISION - CLOSED HEAD INJURY - SKULL FRACTURE - PERMANENT BRAIN INJURY TO NINE-YEAR-OLD BOY - REDUCTION IN IQ - DIMINUTION IN FUTURE EARNING CAPACITY SOUGHT.
This action arose from an accident involving the nine-year-old male plaintiff and the defendant's ten-wheel tractor-trailer. The plaintiff claimed the truck made a negligent right-hand turn and ran over the boy. The defendant argued that the minor plaintiff actually walked into the side of its truck. The defense also disputed the extent and nature of the injuries sustained by the plaint...
- from The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (46357) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $10,000. Breakdown: $4,000 in past medicals and $6,000 for pain and suffering. - Jury Awards Damages to Injured Motorist
Facts: A retiree who had just purchased a 1964 Buick lost the classic vehicle the next day when it was demolished in a rear-end accident. Defendant admitted liability. Plaintiff was awarded $10,000 by a Kershaw County jury.

Plaintiff Ruben Monagas and Defendant Jessica P. Branham were traveling in the same direction on Red Fox Road in Camden on February 28, 2004. Jessica's young...
- from The Carolina Verdict Reporter (127181) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $202,400. Breakdown: $7,000 to plaintiff parents for past medicals; $5,400 to plaintiff parents for future hair transplant; $30,000 to plaintiff child for full hair transplant; and $160,000 for pain and suffering to plaintiff child. - Daycare Providers Sued for Dog Attack of 4 Year Old Boy
Facts: A child's daycare provider was sued after the boy was attacked by the daycare providers' dog. This lawsuit was brought by the boy's parents. The jury awarded plaintiffs $202,400 after deliberating 2.5 hours.

Plaintiff Jeffrey M. Caples and Kelly Caples took their 4 year old son, Benjamin Caples, to a home-based daycare owned and operated by Defendants Catherine Serfas and...
- from The Michigan Trial Reporter (129249) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ RECOVERY Negligent pull-out from Medical Center - Aggravation of preexisting TMJ dysfunction - Herniated lumbar disc.
The plaintiff claimed that the defendant negligently pulled out of the Wellington Medical Center into the path of her car, causing the plaintiff's vehicle to strike the defendant's car. The defendant, a 17-year-old male, alleged that the accident could have been avoided by the plaintiff. The defense also disputed the extent and nature of the injuries which the plaintiff claimed to have sustained ...
- from The Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (47963) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $400,000 plus interest. Breakdown: $100,000 defamation and privacy invasion and $25,000 exemplary against Karen and $100,000 privacy invasion, $125,000 defamation and $50,000 exemplary against William. - Libel & Slander Slander - Child Abuse Allegation - Nanny - Defamation - Intentional Tort - Punitive Damages
Facts: Plaintiff was employed as a nanny by defendants. Defendant husband became romantically obsessed with plaintiff. Plaintiff resigned, allegedly because she could not tolerate his advances. Over a period of approximately eight months, defendant husband allegedly wrote love letters to plaintiff, made telephone calls to her and asked her to elope with him. Plaintiff ultimately marked one ...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (113502) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $1,950,000 Breakdown: $1,400,000 compensatory 550,000 punitives - Medical Malpractice Medical Malpractice - Insertion Of Catheter - Consent - Wrongful Death - Juveniles - Punitive Damages
Facts: Decedent, plaintiff's fifteen year-old son, injured his hip and leg in an auto accident and he subsequently developed a bone infection. Decedent received antibiotics intravenously over a two and one-half month period. Defendant physicians ultimately recommended insertion of a Hickman catheter into decedent's heart to deliver antibiotics directly into the blood stream. Plaintiff re...
- from The Georgia Trial Reporter (100172) Login for Child Injury Verdict
______ $15,000 against Frazier only. - Sexual Abuse Sexual Abuse - Track Team Coach - Assault & Battery - Schools - Juveniles - Assault & Battery - Intentional Tort
Facts: Plaintiff, a 17-year-old female student at North High School, was a member of the girls' varsity track team. Defendant Frazier was the team's coach. The parties engaged in sexual activity. Defendant ultimately pled no contest to felony sexual battery for engaging in sexual conduct with a minor.

Plaintiff alleged that: (1) she was sexually assaulted and brutalized by...
- from The Ohio Trial Reporter (119143) Login for Child Injury Verdict

Pages:   1   2   3   4   5   6   ...   Next

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Child Injury Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Child Injury case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * Personal Injury: Child Injury Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.

This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.